Where In the World is Patricia Wright?




Public records show that Virginia's Superintendent of Public Instruction, Patricia Wright, enjoyed some $22,350 worth of international travel in 2010-11 at the expense of companies that do business (or would like to) with the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE).

Her trips have taken her to some lovely places -- London, England (twice); Lisbon, Portugal; Petropolis and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Korolev, Russia.  

What companies?  Why, Pearson, through its “philanthropic arm” the Pearson Foundation.  Pearson, of course, is the educational services company that (for a mere $110 million) administers the Virginia SOL tests under contract with VDOE.  Also Verizon, and Intel, and Microsoft, and HP, just to name some others you might recognize.  

VDOE spokesman, Charles Pyle, confirmed that Wright has attended several international conferences sponsored by Pearson and other companies that have paid her expenses and which do business with VDOE.  Pyle defended Wright's acceptance of these travel expenses and amenities stating: " [...] Like all state agency heads, Dr. Wright abides by the state conflict of interest law."  


He further acknowledged that VDOE currently has three contracts with Pearson:  

   Standards of Learning (SOL) Program testing contract —current three-year renewable contract began July 1 for an estimated $110 million over three years.  However, actual amounts paid to Pearson each year can vary based on invoiced costs.  For instance, last year, in FY11, VDOE paid Pearson approximately $26 million for the testing contract. 
   Development and maintenance of Virginia Student Longitudinal Data System —$3.2 million per year.  Annual contract renewals are available through FY14. Lead Turnaround Partner — three-year statewide contract entered into on behalf of affected school divisions for these services.  VDOE pays no costs on this contract.  Only affected school divisions can purchase off this contract.

Pyle claims that because Wright was not involved in these procurement processes -- other than to approve the selections that resulted from each -- the procurement processes were carried out in accordance with state law. 

REALLY? 

I asked John R. Butcher, my friend, colleague, retired attorney and author of The Cranky Taxpayer website, what his thoughts were concerning the conflict of interest question and Wright's acceptance of $22,350 in travel expenses.  He noted that while this cozy relationship may or may not pass legal tests, it certainly does not pass the smell test and raises some significant questions that Superintendent Wright should want to answer. 

Butcher's questions for the Superintendent: 
  • Why do you suppose Pearson sent you to Rio instead of, say, me or the Virginia Teacher of the Year
  • What did you learn about “Digital Innovation” in London and Lisbon that you might not have learned in Richmond or Chicago or Dallas? 
  • What did Pearson think it was getting for its $5,250? 
  • What did you learn about “Education for Economic Success” in London that you might not have learned in DC or Memphis? What did Cisco, Intel, Microsoft, HP, Pearson, and Promethean Brittannica think they were getting for their $1,900? 
  • What did you learn about “Extending the Teaching Profession” in Petropolis and Rio that you might not have learned in New Orleans or Atlanta? What did Pearson think it was getting for its $10,500? 
  • What did you learn about the International Space Olympics in Russia that you might not have learned from GoogleWhat do you suppose Verizon thought it might get from you for its $4,700? 
  • The Conflict of Interests Act provides immunity for a state official who acts in reliance upon an advisory opinion of the Attorney General.  Did you get one for any of this travel? 

STAND TALL AND SPEAK TRUTH TO POWER ...


PLEASE JOIN ME TONIGHT WHEN I attend the SaveOurSchools Rally and Speak Truth to Power as the Richmond City Council considers the City of Richmond Public Schools Budget @ 6 pm, Richmond City Hall, City Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 9th and Broad Streets, Richmond, Virginia.

 MARY McLEOD BETHUNE'S
 LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT

I leave you love. Love builds. It is positive and helpful. It is more beneficial than hate.
I leave you hope. The Negro’s growth will be great in the years to come. Yesterday, our ancestors endured the degradation of slavery, yet they retained their dignity. Today, we direct our economic and political strength toward winning a more abundant and secure life. 
I leave you the challenge of developing confidence in one another. As long as Negroes are hemmed into racial blocs by prejudice and pressure, it will be necessary for them to band together for economic betterment… 
I leave you a thirst for education. Knowledge is the prime need of the hour. More and more, Negroes are taking full advantage of hard-won opportunities for learning, and the educational level of the Negro popuation is at its highest point in history… 
I leave you a respect for the uses of power. We live in a world, which respects power above all things. Power, intelligently directed, can lead to more freedom. Unwisely directed, it can be a dreadful, destructive force. 
I leave you faith. Faith is the first factor in a life devoted to service. Without faith, nothing is possible. With it, nothing is impossible… 
I leave you racial dignity. I want Negroes to maintain their human dignity at all costs. We, as Negroes, must recognize that we are the custodians as well as the heirs of a great civilization… 
I leave you a desire to live harmoniously with your fellow men. The problem of color is world-wide… 
I leave you finally a responsibility to our young people… Our children must never lose their zeal for building a better world. They must not be discouraged from aspiring to greatness… Nor must they forget that the masses of our people are still underprivileged, ill-housed, impoverished and victimized by discrimination. 
The Freedom Gates are half ajar. We must pry them fully open.

Needs of the Few vs. Needs of the Many

Concerned that Mayor Dwight C. Jones' plan to demolish Overby-Sheppard Elementary School and build a brand-new $21.5 million school in its place is both an ambitious overstepping of his authority and a wasteful use of tax money that allows the needs of the few to outweigh the needs of the many, four members of the City of Richmond Public School Board sent a letter Wednesday to the members of City Council asking for their help. [Click HERE to read the letter].

While the letter acknowledges appreciation for the importance of the Dove Court project and for new schools in general,  School Board member Kimberly B. Gray, one of the signers of the letter, emphasized that there are schools in the city in far greater need of  improvements.  The four board members attached a copy of the latest facilities assessment to illustrate their point. [Click HERE to read the facilities assessment].


While the letter and individual SB members stressed a desire to work together, the letter asks that council members take into account "the three facilities studies we have conducted over the past 10 years and consider the recommendations in those studies" and notes that "the current Overby-­‐Sheppard School is one of our newer school buildings and has only been recommended for renovation – not demolition." 

Gray said the four board members sent the letter  because  "there comes a time when we must concern ourselves with what is best for the greater good  of our city and our children, not what is good for individual districts." Other signers included Glen Sturtevant (1st District), Kristen Larson, (4th District) and Mamie Taylor (5th District).  

The letter details some of the dire needs present in other schools: 
  • At Carver Elementary School-­‐ a portion of the ceiling in a classroom collapsed. 
  • At Fairfield Elementary and Thompson Middle Schools – holes in the roofs that are leaking a black substance and water into classrooms, the library and down classroom windows. The rugs, floors and walls at the schools are stained and emergency exit lighting equipment is damaged. 
  • Overheated pipes at George Mason Elementary School gave a student second degree burn when he accidentally leaned against one of the many exposed pipes in the school building. 
Gray emphasized that there has never been a city-wide meeting of citizens to discuss the proposed school, nor has the proposal been brought to the School Board.  "The School Board is supposed to make these decisions, we were elected by citizens in this city to do this job -- not the mayor, not City Council, not the people at the Richmond Rehabilitative Housing Authority (RRHA)."  

Addressed to Council President Charles Samuels (2nd District), the letter points out that City Council allocated less than $1 million for the combined facility needs of 50 ...  [other RPS buildings] ... and $21 million for the Dove Court School, and asks that the members of City Council:
  • Please meet with the school board and school administration to fully
    understand the CIP needs of all of our schools. 
  • Work with us to develop a full comprehensive plan for the new Dove Court school to include a curriculum that will not only close the achievement gap for the students in the Dove Court area, but will also attract new families to the community. 
  • Do not give preferential treatment to a new school project at the expense of all of the other schools and students in our district. 
 The letter questions and cautions City Council members concerning comments made to them by city officials "that the pending sale of the Arlington Road warehouse could be put towards facility maintenance, even though that decision has yet to be made by the school board." 

Further, the letter wants to know why the proceeds from the Westhampton lease "were completely omitted from our CIP allocation."

Larsen sent out a copy of the letter to constituents last night explaining that she signed it " [...] because I support adequate capital improvements funding for all of our schools."  Earlier in the day she noted that the School Board needs to be "fair" to all schools.


"We can't even agree on closing schools, what kind of sense does it make to spend our tax dollars to build a new one," asked Sturtevant.  "This is a classic example of the waste that comes when the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing."  

Efforts to reach Taylor and other board members for comment last night were unsuccessful. School Board Chairman Jeff Bourne is out of the country and not expected back until next week.

Stay tuned.

Playing the Numb3rs ... ?

Ironically, as some members of Richmond City Council and the Richmond School Board  threw  hard-ball questions last week at city officials concerning Mayor Dwight C. Jones' plan to demolish Overby-Sheppard Elementary School and replace it with a brand-new $21.5 million elementary school as part of the Dove Court rehabilitation project,  RPS officials learned that Overby-Sheppard is in immediate need of replacing two roof-top air conditioning units  (RTUs).  

Early estimates of cost to replace them is $300,000.  Significantly, these RTUs will be good for about 20 years, but some school officials worry that they are not easily transferrable to other locations should the school be demolished.  Add to School Board worries, the fact that Mayor Jones has recommended that RPS receives only $500,000 for maintenance and repair of 27 other school buildings.   After purchasing the replacement units, RPS School Board members and administration will have only $200,000 left for the upkeep and repair of other RPS buildings. 

School Board members say they haven’t been consulted on the new school and contend  that they -- not Mayor Dwight C. Jones’ administration -- should determine the city’s educational needs.

Given that seven of the nine members of the School Board are new this year, it is little wonder that they have been surprised by the Mayor's efforts to work with Richmond Rehabilitative Housing Authority (RRHA) to circumvent the authority and the Constitutionally vested duties enumerated in The Virginia Code (see sidebar on far right side of this page). 

Ostensibly to avoid Virginia open meeting law, Jones administration officials have called each of the nine members into individual meetings -- and some with two board members present -- meetings to discuss the project with leaders from the city and the Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority, however there has been no city-wide public meeting on the proposed school.

Curiously, prior to the seating of the current School Board, RPS Supt. Yvonne Brandon and former chair of the School Board Chandra Smith were indeed included in planning sessions and trips to other locations to see how a "new" school can help anchor efforts to disperse concentrated poverty and replace the units with mixed-income housing.  Click HERE to see a RRHA video presentation about the project and HERE to see an August 2012 news release from RRHA that provides detailed background information on the history of the project and its financing. 

RPS administration officials and former school board members have offered no response to repeated questions about why the possibility of partnering with Jones and RRHA was never brought to the full board for discussion, much less a vote on whether  a new school is needed in Southern Barton Heights.

Further, given that meeting notes and transcripts of planning sessions and community meetings show that some School Board members and RPS officials knew of this possibility as far back as 2009, but they did not share this information with all their colleagues.  
It is especially galling and exasperating that knowing this, the RPS administration and a majority of members of the 2008-2012 School Board nonetheless continued to spend money earmarked for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations at Overby- Sheppard. 

“Nobody’s opposed to the school itself. I think the vision for redoing that housing community is a good one,” [....] “nobody can tell us what that money’s for,” Jonathan T. Baliles, 1st District CC member, was quoted in Zach Reid's story for the Richmond Times Dispatch. 

Indeed.  After listening to Jones preach that austerity measures require that the city public schools receive only $500,000 for repair and maintenence of 27 other school facilities, it is easy to understand why School Board members felt blind-sided when they learned that Jones is now asking that City Council approve $400,000 in next year’s Capital Improvement Program for planning and design of the school and $500,000 in the general fund for a line item titled “Dove Street infrastructure and school.”

Should the School Board and Mayor Jones reach an impasse on this question, odds are the School Board would win.  The School Board has a Constitutionally vested authority spelled out in the Virginia Code (see sidebar on far right of this page).  

Moreover, Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (nominated by Ronald Reagan on January 30, 1984) noted in a 2007 decision Bacon v. City of Richmond that  "[...] under Virginia law, the City of Richmond is vested with bare legal title and thus the owner of school buildings in name only.   Equitable title to school property rests in the hands of the School Board.   It is the School Board that is “vested with the exclusive control of all school property ․ both real and personal.”  Sch. Bd. of Chesterfield County, 28 S.E.2d at 704;  see also Va.Code Ann. § 22.1-125. This is true even where legal “title to such property is vested ․ in ․ a city.”  Va.Code Ann. § 22.1-125.B. Likewise, the School Board is the legal entity charged with the care, management, and control of school property.  Id. § 22.1-79(3)."

During a meeting Monday on proposed council budget amendments, the council was told the $500,000 was intended for debt service on the school project. 

Baliles was among the council members who questioned why the city was setting aside money to pay debt when a plan to borrow the money had yet to be presented. “Is there a plan?” Baliles said in an interview with the RT-D's Reid: “You can’t pay debt service on bonds you haven’t issued.”

Reid's report in the RT-D also noted that  last year, in a presentation to the council, the city administration said the new school would be paid for by the Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority and that the city would cover the debt service on the project, which was estimated at $2 million per year for 25 years. This year, however, those plans seem to have shifted.

According to the proposed Capital Improvement Program for fiscal 2014-18, city appropriations of $2.6 million in 2015 and $18.3 million in 2016 are included for the new Overby-Sheppard elementary school.  Chief Administrative Officer Byron C. Marshall said how the proposed school will be financed has yet to be determined.

In that case, Baliles, who formerly worked in the city’s department of planning and development, questioned the $400,000 appropriation for planning and design of the school.  “If we’re paying that money to amend plans we already own, we’re getting ripped off,” he said.

Carry Us Back to Ol' Virginny?


Virginia Department of Education Goal:  Cut Gap between Highest -- Lowest-Performing Schools by Half

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE), following a formula approved by the Board of Education and the US Department of Education (USED), has established new annual benchmarks for raising achievement in the commonwealth’s lowest-performing schools. The new annual objectives in reading and mathematics replace the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) targets schools were previously required to meet under the federal No Child Left Behind Act.

Under the provisions of the two-year flexibility waiver granted by USED on June 29, ambitious but achievable annual measurable objectives (AMOs) have been set for student subgroups, including new “proficiency gap groups” comprising students who historically have had difficulty meeting the commonwealth’s achievement standards:

·         Proficiency Gap Group 1 — Students with disabilities, English language learners and economically disadvantaged students, regardless of race and ethnicity (unduplicated)
·         Proficiency Gap Group 2 — African-American students, not of Hispanic origin, including those also counted in Proficiency Gap Group 1
·         Proficiency Gap Group 3 — Hispanic students, of one or more races, including those also counted in Proficiency Gap Group 1

The benchmarks are set with the goal of reducing by half proficiency gaps in reading and mathematics between schools performing at the 20th and 90th percentiles — overall and for each subgroup and proficiency gap group — over six years.

“Accomplishing this goal will make a difference in the lives of thousands of Virginia students in chronically underperforming schools,” Superintendent of Public Instruction Patricia I. Wright said.

“The commonwealth and school divisions are now able to focus federal resources on the schools most in need of reform while maintaining accountability for raising achievement in all schools through Virginia’s accreditation standards,” Board of Education President David M. Foster said.

The AMOs were determined using a formula based on the federal law and student-achievement data from the state’s assessment program. Annual reading benchmarks for the first year of flexibility are based on achievement on 2010-2011 state assessments and mathematics benchmarks are based on achievement during 2011-2012.

Reading Annual Measurable Objectives
Accountability Year
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
Assessment Year
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
2016-2017
All Students
85
Reading AMOs for accountability years 2013-2014 through 2017-2018 will be calculated based on achievement on revised Reading SOL tests administered during 2012-2013
Proficiency Gap Group 1
76
Proficiency Gap Group 2 (Black Students)
76
Proficiency Gap Group 3 (Hispanic Students)
80
Students with Disabilities
59
ELL students
76
Economically Disadvantaged Students
76
Asian Students
92
White Students
90

Mathematics Annual Measurable Objectives
Accountability Year
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
Assessment Year
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
2016-2017
All Students
61
64
66
68
70
73
Proficiency Gap Group 1
47
49
52
54
56
58
Proficiency Gap Group 2 (Black Students)
45
48
50
52
54
57
Proficiency Gap Group 3 (Hispanic Students
52
55
57
60
62
65
Students with Disabilities
33
36
39
42
45
49
ELL students
39
42
45
48
51
54
Economically Disadvantaged Students
47
50
52
54
56
59
Asian Students
82
83
85
86
88
89
White Students
68
70
72
74
76
78

“The mathematics AMOs are based on student achievement on the rigorous new Standards of Learning (SOL) tests introduced last year and are designed for the specific purpose of cutting in half the gap between Virginia’s lowest- and highest-performing schools,” Wright said. “These new annual objectives should not be compared with last year’s AYP benchmarks.” 

Reading benchmarks will be reset next year based on the performance of students during 2012-2013 on new reading SOL tests reflecting the increased rigor of the 2010 English standards.

Under the flexibility granted last month, Virginia schools and school divisions will no longer receive annual AYP ratings. However, information on schools and school divisions meeting and not meeting the new, annual federal benchmarks will be reported in early September on the VDOE website.

VDOE also will report on low-performing schools identified as “priority” and “focus” schools. Priority and focus schools are subject to state-approved and monitored school-improvement interventions. Priority and focus schools, however, are not subject to previous federal “improvement” sanctions, such as having to provide public school choice or private tutoring.

Five percent of Virginia’s Title I schools (36) will be identified as priority schools based on overall reading and mathematics achievement as well as graduation rates for high schools. Priority schools must engage a state-approved turnaround partner to help implement a school-improvement model meeting state and federal requirements.

Ten percent of Virginia’s Title I schools (72) will be designated as focus schools based on reading and mathematics achievement of students in the three proficiency gap groups. Focus schools must employ a state-approved coach to help the division develop, implement and monitor intervention strategies to improve the performance of students at risk of not meeting achievement standards or dropping out of school.

Many of the commonwealth’s underperforming schools are already subject to these and similar interventions as a consequence of state accountability provisions and requirements for schools receiving federal School Improvement Grant (SIG) funds.

All public schools — including schools that do not receive Title I funds under the federal education law — must develop and implement improvement plans to raise the achievement of student subgroups not meeting the annual benchmarks.

School divisions also are expected to meet the new annual measurable objectives in reading and mathematics for all student subgroups and proficiency gap groups.

# # #

Information provided by Virginia Department of Education

Disability News ...

Disability Scoop - Developmental Disability News
E-Mail News | Friday, May 3, 2013
Latest Headlines from DisabilityScoop.com


Groups Alarmed By Request To Ease Education Standards
Disability advocates are crying foul after some school districts sought flexibility under federal education rules, a move they say could prove harmful to students with disabilities.

States Get Ranked On Disability Services
Arizona is the place to be when it comes to services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, according to a new national ranking.

Teen With Down Syndrome Scores Prom Date With Beauty Queen
A Wisconsin teen with Down syndrome will have a very special prom date this weekend -- a bona fide beauty queen.

Jury Awards $240 Million For ADA Violations
A federal jury has awarded $240 million to 32 men with intellectual disabilities for what government attorneys described as years of abuse and discrimination at the hands of their employer.

Jobs Report Shows Little Change For People With Disabilities
As the economy added 165,000 jobs last month, the U.S. Department of Labor said Friday that the employment situation remained largely unchanged for Americans with disabilities.


Most Popular This Week
» Family Sues Over Altered Photo Of Son With Down Syndrome
» Autism Risk May Be Apparent At Birth, Study Finds
» Lacking Speech, Boy Uses Stick Figures To Report Abuse
» Neighbors Clash Over Blue Light Supporting Autism
» States Get Ranked On Disability Services
Recent E-Mail News Issues
» Tuesday, April 30, 2013
» Friday, April 26, 2013
» Tuesday, April 23, 2013