*****
By John R. Butcher
If we graph those data, we see a clear trend. Indeed, it makes sense that mid-career salary would correlate with occupational earnings.
There are two clearly anomalous data points: the University of Richmond (the yellow square) and Mary Washington (the pink circle) are well removed from the trend.
Richmond is the only “Baccalaureate College[]” in the list, albeit it offers advanced degrees in law, education, and other subjects. Presumably Brookings looked only at the undergraduate program. As to why Richmond graduates would have relatively high mid-career salaries but low earnings, go figure.
If we just look at the research universities, we see a clearer picture: Outstanding performance, except from VCU, and a clear trend.
Unfortunately, VCU seems devoted to its mediocre performance. They are spending $90,000 per year of your and my tax money to hire Richmond’s failed Superintendent as as an Associate Professor in “Educational Leadership.” If that kind of “leadership” is characteristic of VCU, it’s a miracle that their graduates’ earnings are not still lower.
Turning to the schools with masters programs:
Here we see another fairly clear trend, with Mary Washington and Hampton showing anomalous mid-career salary outcomes.
My takeaway: Enjoy VCU basketball and send your kids to another university.
————————————————————
Note added Wednesday afternoon: The inimitable Carol Wolf pointed out that VUU beat VCU as to both earnings and mid-career salary.
Indeed. VUU in green, VCU in red:
In fact, it’s more dramatic than that. VCU is a research university, while VUU is in the lower-scoring cohort of “Master’s Colleges and Universities.” It would have been entirely unremarkable if VCU had significantly outscored VUU. It is entirely remarkable that VUU whipped VCU in both rankings.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Remember: I will review all comments before posting and if you wish your information to remain confidential, please know that I will honor your request.